Intended for healthcare professionals

Editorials

Sobering assessment of Scotland’s NHS

BMJ 2024; 384 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q602 (Published 15 March 2024) Cite this as: BMJ 2024;384:q602
  1. Gerry McCartney, professor of wellbeing economy1,
  2. Neil Craig, professor of public health economics2
  1. 1University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  2. 2Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
  1. Correspondence to: G McCartney Gerard.McCartney{at}glasgow.ac.uk

Leaders must prioritise prevention, primary care, and the social and commercial determinants of health

Audit Scotland’s latest report on the Scottish NHS is sobering reading.1 It highlights costs rising because of inflation, higher utility costs, and pay and prescribing pressures; demand for services rising faster than activity post-pandemic; and operational challenges affecting patient safety and experience. It concludes that, without reform, the future financial sustainability of NHS services is in doubt. It calls for investment in prevention to tackle the causes of ill health, and the development of a clear national strategy for health and social care. Without this, according to Audit Scotland, long term planning will be more difficult for NHS boards.1

Would this be enough to achieve financial sustainability? To answer this, it is important to understand why the NHS is under such pressure. The demand for healthcare is a function of need and supply. Need is largely determined by trends in population health and illness (although need can also increase through expansion of what is deemed treatable over time). Average life expectancy in Scotland stopped improving around 2012, as in the rest of the UK. It worsened for people …

View Full Text

Log in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe

* For online subscription