Editorials
Scientific literature's open sesame?
BMJ 2003; 326 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7396.945 (Published 03 May 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;326:945
Related articles
- Letter Published: 03 July 2003; BMJ 327 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.54
- Letter Published: 03 July 2003; BMJ 327 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.54-c
- Letter Published: 04 December 2003; BMJ 327 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1347-d
- Letter Published: 03 July 2003; BMJ 327 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.53-b
- Letter Published: 03 July 2003; BMJ 327 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.54-a
- Student Published: 01 September 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/sbmj.0409310
- Opinion Published: 01 March 2022; BMJ 376 doi:10.1136/bmj.o536
See more
- Constitutional symptoms in a young personBMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i5781; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5781
- The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight saversBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425
- EU to launch new antimicrobial resistance action planBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6328; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6328
- A typical sign on a plain knee radiographBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6021
- An older man with thoracic back painBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i5786; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5786
Cited by...
- When I use a word . . . . Bioscience journals--an open and shut case?
- Who should own medical knowledge?
- Open access publishing takes off
- Paying for bmj.com: Is this measure scientific literature's half open sesame?
- "Author pays" publishing model: NHS authors now enjoy free open access publication
- "Author pays" publishing model: Only "bad" authors should pay
- "Author pays" publishing model: Model is concerned with vanity and profit
- "Author pays" publishing model: Not all authors will gain
- "Author pays" publishing model: Answering to some objections
- "Author pays" publishing model: Strategy is needed to get from A to B