What's a good doctor and how do you make one?
BMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7366.711 (Published 28 September 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:711All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
I really appreciated the September 28, 2002 issue of British Medical
Journal article
by Alison Tonks regarding “What makes a good doctor, and how do you make
one?”
You provided a very universal approach to the validity of doctors and
healing techniques.
From an anthropological perspective, the qualities of a good doctor
depicted by your
article may apply to all cultures from Britain to the Amazon jungle. It
is impressive that
24 different countries were surveyed in ascertaining these results. This
study could have
been made very ethnocentric; focusing merely on western medicine
practices. However,
you have not neglected the sometimes overlooked but equally important
Shaman or Tribal
healers of other cultures. Undoubtedly, those doctors exhibit the same
(and perhaps
more) distinguishable qualities of good medicine practice.
Tyler D Panian
Trans4merz@aol.com
Competing interests: No competing interests
I had a surgeon. He was a lovely man;welcoming,interested and
chatty.But when things went wrong I discovered he was also lazy,
autocratic,dismissing my reasonable request out of hand, and not entirely
honest. The result was a year of anxiety and pain.
I had a surgeon. She was brusque,almost rude, greeting me with ' I
can't do anything about your walking, if that's what you want'. She was
short on small talk, but she was honest, a careful operator and listened
to my opinion, slightly modifying the post-operative routine as a result.
If your problem is a minor one, as is the case for the majority of
patients,then Mr A would serve your purpose admirably. For my part I am
prepared to forego the 'bedside manner' for the old fashioned virtues of
concern and competence. They put me back on my feet.
Competing interests: No competing interests
We all know that becoming a good doctor is an ideal that we all
should pursue. The only problem is that one will never have the answer
about oneself. Others, and especially our patients will know.
Life is a gift, and as such I try always to give something else.... to my
patients, to my colleagues, to my medical students, to my friends. Since
last year after every important class or lecture, I have been giving my
students 4 small but simple pieces of advice:
1) Never stop learning. Not only in medicine, but in life, being good and
responsible implies being a good learner. And the best way of learning is
teaching. The day they think they know it all is a bad sign.
2) Never say never. In Medical science 1 plus 1 is not always 2. The
science in medicine implies knowing when it is 2, and the art when it is
not.
3) Be humble. That means not being afraid of saying "I don´t know". That
means knowing when to open the book or when consulting those who know
more.
4) Ask yourself what new things have you learned each day, and if you have
done anything throughout the day that was worthwhile.
Finally I tell them that they are not only future doctors, but they are
human beings, who have also a family, loved ones, friends, and people who
also need us. The important thing at the end is to be at right time when
someone needs us, and giving them all the best we can. Medicine is just a
way of doing it. It does not make doctors better persons just because we
care for others.
The key is discovering that whatever you do, you have to give your best,
with your mind, your heart, your soul.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Doctors should listen carefully enough in order to hear the meanings,
interpretations, and understandings that give shape to the worlds of the
patients. Through the interview, the doctors can unravel complicated
relationships between environment and patients. The good interview
techniques can allow the doctors as researchers to learn how present
illness experiences resulted from past life history of the patients.
During the interviews, the patients are given some power to control
the interview. For example, the power decides what to tell and what to
talk about. Therefore, an in-depth qualitative interviewing creates the
stories for patients. Stories can communicate a moral concern, a message
or a set of core beliefs. These stories may be repeated so often that they
become shared myths of a particular group of patients (e.g., age, class,
educational background and types of illnesses). Those myths can specially
be useful to the doctors who are exploring a cultural arena because myths
can summarize the underlying values of the patients.
Thus, learning to listen will help the doctors to interpret the world
around the patients by developing shared understandings and to learn
collectively how to interpret and behave in specific life circumstances
(Anderson & Jack, 1991).
Reference
Anderson, K. & Jack, D. (1991). Learning to Listen: Interview
techniques and Analyses. In: Women's Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral
History, Eds. Sherna Berger Gluck and Daphne Patai, Routledge: New York,
pp. 11-26.
Competing interests: No competing interests
A good doctor should remember the points as follows:
Doing the best for patients wholeheartedly
observing all the signs and symptoms of patients and their context
systematically
counseling patients and their families accordingly
treating patients humanly
organizing the assessment and intervention for patients logically
reporting the medical history and treatment regimen for patients
carefully
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dear Sir,
Was it by accident or design that the cover of the current number of the
BMJ - the pictures of 31 people - contains three people from television,
many from hospital specialties, but the Only GP is Harold Shipman?
Yours sincerely,
Irvine Loudon
Competing interests: No competing interests
A good doctor reads poetry.
W H Auden says it all:
"Give me a doctor partridge-plump
Short in the leg and broad in the rump
An endomorph with gentle hands
Who’ll never make absurd demands
That I abandon all my vices
Nor pull a long face in a crisis,
But with a twinkle in his eye
Will tell me that I have to die."
Competing interests: No competing interests
A good doctor should have the ability to conceptualize and implement
beyond the medical model. A good doctor should have the ability to view
the presenting problems from multiple perspectives.
For example, when a patient with anorexia nervosa comes to see a
doctor, the doctor should not only focus on the issues of eating, body
weight, body image and complications of self-starvation. Rather the doctor
should understand the meanings of food refusal in relation to the
patient's psychological issues such as obsessive-compulsive behaviors and
depressive symptoms; the patient's social context such as the gender
roles, peer influences and effects from mass media; the patient's family
context such as parent-child relationships and family communication
patterns.
The patient and the social environment are interdependent. The doctor
can only have a comprehensive assessment for the patient with an
ecological perspective on health and illness. To conclude, a good doctor
should be ready to challenge his / her own taken-for-granted understanding
of the medical knowledge and to acquire knowledge from other disciplines
such as sociology, psychology, social work, nursing, environment science,
communication studies and others.
Competing interests: No competing interests
a good doctor is one who has:
good sense and character,
common sense,
special sense (intuition)
manan
Competing interests: No competing interests
What is a "self-limited disease"?
The authors state that a good doctor "is not one who makes the best
diagnosis because in many cases of self limited or incurable disorders the
precise and timely diagnosis does not make a great difference for the
patient."
I have a question about the term "self-limited." It seems to be used
differently by different practitioners and authors. A dictionary from 1928
gives typhoid fever as an example of a "self-limited" disease (1) while an
online dictionary today says that a "self-limited disease" is one that
"resolves spontaneously with or without specific treatment" (2). These
two definitions seem to contradict.
I would like to survey the authors and other readers here what the
term "self-limited disease" means to them. If it does not mean one of the
following to you, then please "fill in the blank."
a) a disease that tends to go away on its own, without treatment.
b) a disease that is typically not affected by treatment and tends to
persist.
John Hart, D.C.
References
1. Webster's New International Dictionary, 1928.
2. http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?query=self-
limited+disease&action=Search
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests