Prospective health impact assessment: pitfalls, problems, and possible ways forward

Additional references

w1 Winters L, Scott-Samuel A. Health impact assessment of the community safety projects Huyton SRB area. Liverpool: Liverpool Public Health Observatory, 1997. (Report Series No 38.)

w2 Fleeman N. Health impact assessment of the Southport drug prevention initiative. Liverpool: Liverpool Public Health Observatory, 1997. (Report Series No 39.)

w3 Winters L. Health impact assessment of the International Astronomy and Space Exploration Centre. Liverpool: Liverpool Public Health Observatory, 1998. (Report Series No 43.)

w4 Fleeman N. A prospective health impact assessment of the Merseyside Integrated Transport Strategy (MerITS). Liverpool: Liverpool Public Health Observatory, 1999. (Report Series No 45.)

w5 Fleeman N, Scott-Samuel A. Health impact assessment of the Southport drug prevention initiative. J Public Health Med 2000;22:268-73.

w6 Health impact assessment of the City of Edinburgh Council’s urban transport strategy. Glasgow: Scottish Needs Assessment Programme, 2000.

w7 Breeze C, Kemm J. The health potential of the objective I programme for West Wales and the Valleys: a preliminary health impact assessment. Cardiff: National Assembly for Wales, 2000.

w8 Mulrow CD, Oxman A, eds. How to conduct a systematic review. In: The Cochrane handbook. Oxford: Cochrane Collaboration, 1997.

w9 Mulrow C.D. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309:597-9.

w10 Breslow RA, Ross SA, Weed DL. Quality of reviews in Epidemiology. Am J Public Health 1998;88:475-7.

w11 Egger M, Dickersin K, Davey Smith D. Problems and limitations in conducting systematic reviews. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman D, eds. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books, 2001.

w12 Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research 1998;8:341-51.

w13 Petticrew M. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions. BMJ 2001;322:98-101.

w14 Murphy E, Dingwell R, Greatbatch D. Qualitative methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment 1998;2(16). [Monograph.]

w15 Patton M. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage, 1990.

w16 Boruch RE. Randomized experiments for planning and evaluation: a practical guide. London: Sage, 1994. (Applied Social Research Methods Series Vol 44.)

w17 Fulbright-Anderson K, Kubisch AC, Connell JP, eds. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Vol 2. Theory, measurement and analysis. Washington DC: Aspen Institute, 1998.