Editorials Revisiting the Cochrane Collaboration BMJ 2001; 323 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7317.821 (Published 13 October 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:821 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editor's Choice War, normality, and a time for women Published: 13 October 2001; BMJ 323 doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7317.0 Editor's Choice War, normality, and a time for women Published: 13 October 2001; BMJ 323 doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7317.0/a Paper Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998 Published: 13 October 2001; BMJ 323 doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7317.829 Correction Revisiting the Cochrane Collaboration Published: 01 December 2001; BMJ 323 doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7324.1303a See more Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in individuals with previous colorectal neoplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysis BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6188 NHS to fund large trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6537; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6537 Bill to boost medical research funding and speed drug approval passes US house BMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6498; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6498 Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6112; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6112 Sixty seconds on . . . solanezumab BMJ November 29, 2016, 355 i6389; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6389 Cited by... Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go?Abstract Fulltext PDF Britain's gift: a "Medline" of synthesised evidenceAbstract Fulltext PDF