Editorials Electronic fetal monitoring BMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1436 (Published 16 June 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:1436 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Paper Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric populationCommentary: changes between protocol and manuscript should be declared at submissionCommentary: research governance must focus on research trainingCommentary: Approach to power calculations has to be realistic Published: 16 June 2001; BMJ 322 doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1457 Letter Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation Published: 23 February 2002; BMJ 324 doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7335.482 Cited by... Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysisAbstract Fulltext PDF From Home to Hospital: Mistreatment of Childbearing Women and Barriers to Facility-Based Birth in NicaraguaAbstract Fulltext PDF Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultationAbstract Fulltext PDF Is Intensive Fetal Monitoring During Labor Indicated?Abstract Fulltext PDF
