Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of inhaled salbutamol powder and aerosol in asthmatic patients with low peak expiratory flow level

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The short-term bronchodilator effects of dry salbutamol powder and a pressurized salbutamol aerosol were compared in 22 patients with severe asthma, on 3 consecutive mornings, in a double-dummy cross-over study. Only patients with peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate lower than 250 l/min, were recruited. PEF measurement was employed to assess changes in ventilatory function induced by inhalation of the drugs. No significant difference was found between the PEF changes induced by the dry salbutamol powder (400 µg) and the pressurized aerosol (200 µg). Both forms of the drug produced a significant rise in mean PEF values. The study shows that even in asthmatic patients with poor ventilation, a dry powder inhaler and pressurized aerosol are effective means of drug delivery to the lungs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Editorial (1975) Fluorocarbon aerosol propellants. Lancet 1: 1073–1074

  2. Hetzel MR, Clark TJH (1977) Comparison of salbutamol Rotahaler with conventional pressurized aerosol. Clin Allergy 7: 563–568

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hartley JPR, Nogrady SG, Gibby OM, Seaton A (1977) Bronchodilator effects of dry salbutamol powder administered by Rotahaler. Br J Clin Pharmacol 4: 673–675

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hartley JPR, Nogrady SG, Seaton A (1979) Long-term comparison of salbutamol aerosol in asthmatic out-patients. Br J Dis Chest 73: 271–276

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan D, Paterson C, Harris D, Crompton GK (1977) Comparison of the bronchodilator effects of salbutamol inhaled as a dry powder and by conventional pressurised aerosol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 4: 669–671

    Google Scholar 

  6. Svedmyr N, Löfdahl CG, Svedmyr K (1982) The effect of powder aerosol compared to pressurized aerosol. Eur J Respir Dis 63 [Suppl 119]: 81–88

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hallworth GW (1977) An improved design of powder inhaler. Br J Clin Pharmacol 4: 689–690

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson PB, Goude A, Peake MD (1982) Comparison of salbutamol given by intermittent positive-pressure breathing and pressure-packed aerosol in chronic asthma. Thorax 37: 612–616

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tukiainen, H., Terho, E.O. Comparison of inhaled salbutamol powder and aerosol in asthmatic patients with low peak expiratory flow level. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 27, 645–647 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547042

Key words

Navigation