Intended for healthcare professionals

Editorials

Take back your mink, take back your pearls

BMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7372.1047 (Published 09 November 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:1047

Rejection of the consultant contract starts a new era

  1. Richard Smith, editor
  1. BMJ

    News p 1053 Reviews p 1120

    ”Take back your mink, take back your pearls

    What made you think that I was one of those girls?”

    From the musical Guys and Dolls

    English and Welsh consultants last week rejected the new consultant contract by two to one.1 Specialist registrars, the consultants of the future, rejected it by more than five to one. But consultants from Scotland and Northern Ireland voted for the contract, hastening the pace of devolution. The contract had been negotiated over two years and endorsed by the BMA's central consultants and specialists committee. Peter Hawker, chairman of the committee, resigned when the vote was announced. The resounding rejection of the contract in England and Wales raises difficult questions for the NHS, the government, and the BMA and probably starts a new era of local negotiation and possibly of a junior consultant grade.

    Why was the contract rejected?

    In essence, the new contract offered more money in return for accepting greater managerial control and the potential to be obliged to work unsocial hours.2 Although those who negotiated the contract urged consultants to accept it, the junior doctors committee immediately rejected it.3 Feedback from consultants to the BMJ and other publications and websites was consistently negative, 4 5 and it was no surprise when the contract was rejected.

    It wasn't rejected because of money. Consultants famously had their mouths “stuffed with gold” at the start of the NHS, but this time they've sent back the mink and the pearls. Nor was it rejected because of minor restrictions on private practice. It was rejected primarily because it gave more control to managers, people who in many hospitals are neither trusted nor respected. This might be seen as a simple power struggle, with consultants refusing to be told what …

    View Full Text

    Log in

    Log in through your institution

    Subscribe

    * For online subscription