Doctors' knowledge about evidence based medicine terminology
BMJ 2002; 324 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7343.929 (Published 20 April 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;324:929General practitioners may not know the jargon, but could use the knowledge
- James D Woodcock, quality assurance editor,
- Sarah Greenley, information specialist,
- Stuart Barton, editor
- Clinical Evidence, BMJ Publishing Group, London WC1H 9JR
Primary care p 950
In a report published in this issue (p 950) Australian general practitioners rated themselves and were then tested on their evidence based medicine skills.1 The results are not encouraging. Fifty general practitioners in Australia rated their understanding of seven common terms from evidence based medicine from “It would not be helpful for me to understand this term” to “I understand this and could explain it to others.” On average, only 22% said they understood each term and could explain it to others. Worse still, in the subsequent structured interview only one general practitioner could provide a fully satisfactory explanation of any of the terms, and many of the explanations revealed considerable misunderstanding. The authors of the study argue that general practitioners need to understand these terms to practise evidence based medicine and that there is little good research on how this can be done. …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.