Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1107 (24 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7399.1107
Sydney Christopher Zinn
An Australian Supreme Court judge is considering a case that challenges the legal protection of doctor-patient confidentiality after two GPs failed to inform a woman that her African fiancé was HIV positive after the couple attended a surgery together for blood tests.
The 28 year old woman, who went on to contract the disease, is suing the doctors in the New South Wales court for negligence and breach of contract for not taking adequate steps to protect her interests.
The woman, known as "PD" in court, was concerned about the high rate of HIV in the man's home country of Ghana, but he failed to tell her about his positive test and forged a pathology report to convince her to have unprotected sex.
She is seeking damages for pain and suffering, financial loss, care for her children, and medical expenses. The landmark hearing was told she might
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?