BMJ 2003;327:478-479 (30 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7413.478
Paper
Children and young people who die from cancer: epidemiology and place of death in England (1995-9)
Irene J Higginson, head of department1,
Margaret Thompson, statistician1
1 Department of Palliative Care and Policy, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's School of Medicine, King's College London, London SE5 9RJ
Correspondence to: I Higginson irene.higginson{at}kcl.ac.uk
Introduction
Survival from cancer among children and young adults has improved,
but a need remains to care for the one in four who cannot yet
be cured.
13
One component of quality care is to provide
it in the place of choice,
3 usually home; we analysed factors
affecting place of death.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Descriptive statistics for cancer deaths registered in England and Wales in 1995-9, for children and adolescents (age range 0-15) and young adults (age range 16-24). Values are numbers (percentages) unless otherwise indicated
|
|
Participants, methods, and results
We derived data from death registrations for all cancer deaths
(international classification of diseases, 9th revision, codes
140-239) in England and Wales, for 1995-9, for ages 0-24. Age,
sex, social class, country of place of birth, geographical
location, underlying cause of death, and place of death were
available directly. Further potential explanatory variables
were a classification of local authority type (rural, urban,
inner London, etc) from the Office for National Statistics
and deprivation indices for 2000, from the Department of Environment,
Transport, and the Regions, at parliamentary ward level (treated
as continuous variables, higher scores indicated greater deprivation).
We defined two further variables: diagnosis (main primary tumour)
and whether or not the cancer was a solid tumour.
Response variables indicated whether death took place at home or in hospital, or in a hospice or palliative care unit. We analysed age groups 0-15 (children and adolescents) and 16-24 (young adults) separately. Social class, recategorised on a scale (I-VI, table) and treated as a continuous variable, was based on parents for age range 0-15 years. We used binary logistic regression models in our exploratory analysis to examine associations between place of death and potential explanatory variables. We used multiple logistic regression models to determine the joint effect of variables identified as significant or borderline (P = 0.05-0.1) during exploratory analysis. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals are presented.
During 1995-9 a total of 3197 deaths from cancer in young people aged 0-24 were registered in England. Of the small number of deaths in hospices, 23 (42.6%) among children and adolescents and 34 (24%) among young adults were from brain cancer (table).
A multivariate model for home death, for children and adolescents, indicated that death at home rather than in hospital was less likely for those at the bottom of the social scale (odds ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 0.99)home deaths were 65% in social class I, 49% in V, 44% in VI), with leukaemia or lymphoma rather than solid tumours (0.46, 0.37 to 0.58) less likely in inner London (0.54, 0.32 to 0.92for example, 62% "prosperous" England, 58% rural, 37% inner London) and in areas with high rates of child poverty (0.99, 0.99 to 1.00), all P < 0.05. This was consistent with associations found in univariate analysis. The only potential explanatory variable that was significantly associated with dying in a hospice was a diagnosis of brain cancer (2.52, 1.45 to 4.38, P = 0.001).
Among young adults multivariate analysis found that home death was less likely with increasing age (0.91, 0.80 to 0.95), less likely for young women (0.73, 0.56 to 0.94), patients with leukaemia or lymphoma rather than solid tumours (0.22, 0.97 to 0.30), and where access to local services (school, shops, general practitioner) was good (1.25, 1.05 to 1.49), all P < 0.05.
Comment
Home is an important place of death; 52% of children and adolescents,
and 30% of young adults died at home. This is higher than for
the United States (20%)
4 and for adults (26%).
5
Primary care
and community services are therefore critical, although individual
services encounter patients rarely. Lower social class, living
in inner London, or living in an area of high childhood poverty
reduced the likelihood of home death. Although relatively few
children died in hospices, brain tumours accounted for around
half of these. These findings are relevant to service planning
and need investigation in prospective research.
We thank the Office for National Statistics for its helpful
collaboration, making available these datasets, and guiding
us in their interpretation.
Contributors: IJH conceived the idea for the study, was responsible for day to day management, analysis plan, literature review, and interpretation; MT was responsible for liaison with the Office for National Statistics, data checking, recoding, merger of datasets, and data analysis. Both contributed to the writing of the manuscript and act as co-guarantors for the paper.
Funding: King's College London and the Interdisciplinary Research Group on Palliative and Person Centred Care funded MT to undertake the analysis.
Competing interests: None declared.
References
- Bleyer WA. Cancer in older adolescents and young adults: epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, survival, and importance of clinical trials. Med Pediatr Oncol
2002;38: 1-10.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Goldman A, Beardsmore S, Hunt J. Palliative care for children with cancerhome, hospital or hospice? Arch Dis Child
1990;65: 641-3.[Free Full Text]
- Edwards J. A model of palliative care for the adolescent with cancer. Int J Palliat Nurs
2001;7: 485-8.[Medline]
- Feudtner C, Silveira MJ, Christakis DA. Where do children with complex chronic conditions die? Pattern in Washington State, 1980-1998. Pediatrics
2002;109: 656-60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Higginson IJ, Astin P, Dolan S. Where do cancer patients die? Ten-year trends in the place of death of cancer patients in England. Palliat Med
1998;12: 353-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
(Accepted August 5, 2003)

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Siden, H, Miller, M, Straatman, L, Omesi, L, Tucker, T, Collins, J.
(2008). A report on location of death in paediatric palliative care between home, hospice and hospital. Palliat Med
22: 831-834
[Abstract]
-
Linton, J. M., Feudtner, C.
(2008). What Accounts for Differences or Disparities in Pediatric Palliative and End-of-Life Care? A Systematic Review Focusing on Possible Multilevel Mechanisms. Pediatrics
122: 574-582
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Vickers, J., Thompson, A., Collins, G. S., Childs, M., Hain, R.
(2007). Place and Provision of Palliative Care for Children With Progressive Cancer: A Study by the Paediatric Oncology Nurses' Forum/United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Palliative Care Working Group. JCO
25: 4472-4476
[Abstract]
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Paediatric Palliative Care: At home in Wales.
- Richard D W Hain, et al.
bmj.com, 24 Nov 2003
[Full text]