BMJ 2003;326:780 ( 12 April )

News

Advice on withholding food and water breaks the law, group claims

Zosia Kmietowicz, London

A doctors group is calling for a new law to protect patients who are not dying but who are being denied food and fluids, which they say is common practice and illegal.

An advertisement in this week's BMJ that is funded by the Doctors who Respect Human Life campaign, claims that current General Medical Council's guidance allows doctors to let patients die by withholding artificial feeding and hydration even though they may not be dying.

Richard Gordon QC, from whom the group sought a legal opinion, says that parts of both the GMC's and the BMA's guidance on withholding and withdrawing life prolonging treatment contravenes the European Convention on Human Rights.

Dr Michael Howitt Wilson, chairman of the British section of the campaign, said that the law on withholding food and fluids had been "confused" since the case of Tony Bland, who was left in a coma after being crushed in an incident at Hillsborough football stadium in 1989 that killed nearly 100 people. In 1993 the House of Lords ruled that the artificial nutrition being administered to Tony Bland was a form of treatment and could be withheld at doctors' discretion.

"Since the Bland case we have heard all sorts of stories that people with strokes and other conditions have ceased to be fed even though they were not dying," said Dr Howitt Wilson.

The Patients' Protection Bill, a private members bill that is due to be go before the House of Lords on 30 April, would make the practice illegal if it became law, he added.

The GMC said in a statement that many of the issues raised during debates on the bill had been considered when its own guidance was being developed. "We will follow the passage of this bill with considerable interest, but we are concerned that, as drafted, the bill does not add to the existing legal safeguards for patients," the council said.

The BMA commented: "The primary goal of medicine is to benefit the patient. If medical treatment can no longer do this, then ethically the doctor must start to consider whether it should be withdrawn."


 
(Credit: SPL/SUE FORD )

A patient suffering from brain death is kept alive on a life support machine



© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Walker, A. R P, Walker, B. F, Wadee, A. A (2004). Are there any hopes of lessening the smoking mortality/morbidity burden?. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 124: 160-161  
  • Thomas, H. (2003). GMC guidance on withholding life prolonging treatment. BMJ 326: 1215-1215 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

BMJ News misleading.
Theresa M Howe
bmj.com, 11 Apr 2003 [Full text]
End of life decisions, with illustrations
Susan J Milroy
bmj.com, 12 Apr 2003 [Full text]
Please be more sensitive
Vincent Perkins
bmj.com, 14 Apr 2003 [Full text]
GMC guidance on withholding and withdrawing life prolonging treatment
Hilary Thomas
bmj.com, 14 Apr 2003 [Full text]
Advice on withholding food and water breaks the law, group claims
Michael B Howitt Wilson
bmj.com, 15 Apr 2003 [Full text]
Oxymoronic Journalism
Nevil P Hutchinson
bmj.com, 16 Apr 2003 [Full text]
Law, death, and reality
Michael Potts
bmj.com, 19 Apr 2003 [Full text]
The "brain dead" are not dead
David W Evans
bmj.com, 24 Apr 2003 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview