Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Zosia Kmietowicz A doctors group is calling for a new law to protect patients who
are not dying but who are being denied food and fluids, which they say
is common practice and illegal.
An advertisement in this week's BMJ that is funded by
the Doctors who Respect Human Life campaign, claims that current
General Medical Council's guidance allows doctors to let patients die by withholding artificial feeding and hydration even though they may
not be dying.
Richard Gordon QC, from whom the group sought a legal opinion, says
that parts of both the GMC's and the BMA's guidance on withholding
and withdrawing life prolonging treatment contravenes the European
Convention on Human Rights.
Dr Michael Howitt Wilson, chairman of the British section of the
campaign, said that the law on withholding food and fluids had been
"confused" since the case of Tony Bland, who was left in a coma
after being crushed in an incident at Hillsborough football stadium in
1989 that killed nearly 100 people. In 1993 the House of Lords ruled
that the artificial nutrition being administered to Tony Bland was a
form of treatment and could be withheld at doctors' discretion.
"Since the Bland case we have heard all sorts of stories that people
with strokes and other conditions have ceased to be fed even though
they were not dying," said Dr Howitt Wilson.
The Patients' Protection Bill, a private members bill that is due to
be go before the House of Lords on 30 April, would make the practice
illegal if it became law, he added.
The GMC said in a statement that many of the issues raised during
debates on the bill had been considered when its own guidance was being
developed. "We will follow the passage of this bill with considerable
interest, but we are concerned that, as drafted, the bill does not add
to the existing legal safeguards for patients," the council said.
The BMA commented: "The primary goal of medicine is to benefit the
patient. If medical treatment can no longer do this, then ethically the
doctor must start to consider whether it should be
withdrawn."

(Credit: SPL/SUE FORD )
A patient suffering from brain death is kept alive on a life
support machine
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.