Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
David S Wald a Department of Cardiology, Southampton General
Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, b Wolfson
Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and the London School of
Medicine and Dentistry, London EC1M 6BQ Correspondence to D S Wald
davidwald{at}hotmail.com
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To assess whether the association of serum homocysteine concentration with ischaemic heart disease, deep vein
thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and stroke is causal and, if so, to
quantify the effect of homocysteine reduction in preventing them.
Design:
Meta-analyses of the above three diseases using (a) 72 studies in which the prevalence of a mutation
in the MTHFR gene (which increases homocysteine) was determined in cases (n=16 849) and controls, and (b) 20 prospective
studies (3820 participants) of serum homocysteine and disease risk.
Main outcome measures:
Odds ratios of the three
diseases for a 5 µmol/l increase in serum homocysteine concentration.
Results:
There were significant associations between homocysteine and the three diseases. The odds ratios for a 5 µmol/l increase in serum homocysteine were, for ischaemic heart disease, 1.42 (95% confidence interval 1.11 to 1.84) in the genetic studies and 1.32 (1.19 to 1.45) in the prospective studies; for deep vein thrombosis
with or without pulmonary embolism, 1.60 (1.15 to 2.22) in the genetic
studies (there were no prospective studies); and, for stroke, 1.65 (0.66 to 4.13) in the genetic studies and 1.59 (1.29 to 1.96) in the
prospective studies.
Conclusions:
The genetic studies and the prospective
studies do not share the same potential sources of error, but both
yield similar highly significant results
strong evidence that the
association between homocysteine and cardiovascular disease is causal.
On this basis, lowering homocysteine concentrations by 3 µmol/l from current levels (achievable by increasing folic acid intake) would reduce the risk of ischaemic heart disease by 16% (11% to 20%), deep
vein thrombosis by 25% (8% to 38%), and stroke by 24% (15% to
33%).
|
What is already known on this topic
A common single gene mutation that reduces the activity of an enzyme involved in folate metabolism (MTHFR) is associated with a moderate (20%) increase in serum homocysteine What this study adds
A meta-analysis of prospective studies shows a significant association between homocysteine concentration and ischaemic heart disease similar in size to that expected from the results of the MTHFR studies and a significant association with stroke The MTHFR studies and the prospective studies do not share the same
potential sources of error but both yield similar results On this basis a decrease in serum homocysteine of 3 µmol/l (achievable by daily intake of about 0.8 mg folic acid) should reduce the risk of ischaemic heart disease by 16%, deep vein thrombosis by 25%, and stroke by 24% |
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The serum concentration of the amino acid homocysteine is positively associated with the risk of ischaemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and stroke. 1 2 There is uncertainty over whether these associations are causal. 3 4 Resolving the question of causality is important because serum homocysteine can be lowered by the B vitamin folic acid, 5 6 raising the prospect of a simple and safe means of prevention.
Three rare autosomal recessive disorders (the homocystinurias), in which homozygotes lack one of the three principal enzymes in homocysteine metabolism, cause extremely high serum homocysteine levels (>100 µmol/l) and a high risk of premature cardiovascular disease (affecting half of homozygotes by the age of 307). The biochemical change that is common to all three disorders is a high serum homocysteine concentration (no other substance is consistently high or low), 8 9 indicating that high homocysteine levels cause cardiovascular disease.
Whether moderate increases in serum homocysteine cause cardiovascular
disease has been the subject of debate. Moderate increases occur as a
result of a mutation in the gene coding for the enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) in which cytosine is
replaced by thymidine (C
T) at base position 677 of the gene. This
variant of the enzyme has reduced activity,10 resulting in
an elevation of serum homocysteine concentrations of about 20%.11 The presence of the mutation offers a natural
experiment in which the population have, in effect, been randomly
allocated to one group with higher homocysteine concentrations or one
with a lower level. There is no reason to expect that the two groups differ in any systematic way other than in their serum homocysteine. The C
T mutation is surprisingly common, with about 10% of people in
the population being homozygous affected (TT), 47% homozygous unaffected (CC), and 43% heterozygotes (CT). However, because the
increase in homocysteine is relatively small and the impact of the
mutation varies according to the folate intake in the population, studies comparing the risk of cardiovascular disease in people with and
without the TT mutation need large numbers to be able to show an effect
if one were present. Previous meta-analyses have had too few studies
available to do this.11-13
We present a new meta-analysis of the MTHFR studies (including data
from an additional 34 studies since the previous meta-analyses), which
has the statistical power to show an effect. We compare these results
with those of a meta-analysis of prospective studies of serum
homocysteine and disease events. We assess the evidence for causality
between serum homocysteine and ischaemic heart disease, deep vein
thrombosis with or without pulmonary embolism, and stroke and estimate
the size of the associations with the three diseases.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Identification of studies
We sought two types of study on the association between serum
homocysteine and ischaemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, or
stroke:
To identify studies, we searched databases (Medline, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and ClinPSYC) in any language up to October 2001. Subject headings were homocysteine, homocystine, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase or MTHFR and ischaemic heart disease, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or thromboembolic disease. We included studies that measured fasting or non-fasting serum or plasma homocysteine concentration using any standard laboratory method but excluded studies reporting only homocysteine measured after methionine loading. We excluded studies of children (aged <18 years) and of haemodialysis or renal transplant patients. In the MTHFR studies we restricted our analysis to studies in which the genetic variant was confirmed by DNA testing.
The primary search generated 171 potentially relevant articles, of which 96 met the above criteria. We also scanned the citations lists of these 96 studies and of review articles, yielding 24 extra studies to make 120 studies in total.
Definition of outcomes
In the MTHFR studies patients with ischaemic heart disease had
myocardial infarction or angiographically confirmed coronary artery
occlusion (>50% of the luminal diameter). Cases of deep vein
thrombosis cases included patients with or without pulmonary embolism.
Stroke cases were cerebral infarction or cerebral haemorrhage
identified either clinically or by computed tomography or magnetic
resonance imaging. The control groups were from the general population,
except for some ischaemic heart disease studies, when they were
patients who underwent coronary angiography with normal coronary
arteries. In cohort studies the end points were death from ischaemic
heart disease or non-fatal myocardial infarction, or fatal stroke or
non-fatal cerebral infarction or haemorrhage. Data for analysis were
extracted independently by two of the authors, and the data sets cross checked.
Statistical methods
For each MTHFR study we determined the odds ratio of being
homozygous (TT), and in a separate analysis heterozygous (CT), for the
mutant allele compared with being homozygous for the wild type allele
(CC) in cases and controls.
In the prospective studies we estimated odds ratios for a 5 µmol/l increase in serum homocysteine (a standard reference increment). In studies that did not report this directly we estimated it as follows. In studies reporting an odds ratio for a specified proportional difference in serum homocysteine we took the homocysteine values 2.5 µmol/l above and below the study mean and, from the proportional difference between these two values, calculated the odds ratio corresponding to this 5 µmol/l difference in homocysteine. In studies reporting odds ratios in subgroups defined by ranked homocysteine concentration we fitted a logistic regression line to the data.
We used a random effects model to derive summary odds ratios from combinations of studies to allow for any heterogeneity across studies. In the prospective studies we adjusted the summary odds ratios for regression dilution bias14; these arose because the serum homocysteine values in each person were from single measurements, which are unrepresentative of a person's long term average value over the period of follow up. We corrected for regression dilution bias by raising the summary odds ratio to the power of the ratio of total (between-person plus within-person) variance to between-person variance. With serum homocysteine this ratio increases over time15 (in addition to random short term fluctuations in serum homocysteine within a person6 there may be longer term variations from a variable rate of increase in homocysteine with age). We used a published estimate of 1.33 for the correction factor in the prospective studies (5 year average interval between blood collection and cardiovascular disease events).15
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ischaemic heart disease
Studies of MTHFR mutation
Fig 1 shows the results of the 46 MTHFR studies of ischaemic heart
disease (12 193 cases in total, mean age at time of event 55 years).
The odds ratios of homozygotes for the mutant allele (TT) compared with
wild type homozygotes (CC) are shown, with the studies ranked in order
of increasing effect. There was a wide range of estimates, but the
summary odds ratio was 1.21 (95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.39;
P=0.006), indicating that risk was on average 21% higher in TT
homozygotes than in CC homozygotes. The summary odds ratio for the
heterozygous state (CT v CC) was 1.06 (0.99 to 1.13;
P=0.09).
|
|
Prospective studies and cardiovascular disease
Fig 2 (upper part) shows the results of 16 prospective studies on
ischaemic heart disease (3144 events, mean age at event 62 years).w95-w120 The odds ratios are adjusted for age, sex,
smoking, blood pressure, and serum cholesterol concentration in all the
studies except one, which is adjusted for age and sex
only.w106 The summary odds ratio was 1.23 (1.14 to 1.32)
for a 5 µmol/l increase in serum homocysteine concentration, or 1.32 (1.19 to 1.45) adjusted for regression dilution bias. There was a
suggestion of a trend across the prospective studies for a decreasing
odds ratio with increasing age at the time of the event (P=0.07), as has been observed for other cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, serum
cholesterol, and blood pressure).
|
Deep vein thrombosis
Fig 3 shows the results of the 26 MTHFR studies of deep vein
thrombosis (3439 cases, mean age at event 44 years). The summary odds
ratio for homozygotes for the mutant allele (TT) compared with wild
type homozygotes (CC) was 1.29 (1.08 to 1.54; P=0.007), equivalent to
an odds ratio of 1.60 (1.15 to 2.22) for a 5 µmol/l increase in serum
homocysteine concentration. The summary odds ratio associated with the
heterozygous state (CT v CC) was 1.05 (0.94 to 1.19;
P=0.41).
|
There were no published prospective studies.
Stroke
The seven MTHFR studies of stroke (1217 cases, mean age at event
63 years) yielded relatively few data, so the confidence interval for
the summary result was wide: the odds ratio for homozygotes for the
mutation (TT) compared with wild type homozygotes was 1.31 (0.80 to
2.15), equivalent to an odds ratio of 1.65 (0.66 to 4.13) for a 5 µmol/l increase in serum homocysteine. The summary odds ratio
associated with the heterozygous state (CT v CC) was 1.15 (0.93 to 1.42).
Fig 2 (lower part) shows the results of the eight prospective studies (676 events, mean age at event 70). The results are adjusted for age, sex, smoking, blood pressure, and serum cholesterol in all the studies. The summary odds ratio for a serum homocysteine increase of 5 µmol/l was 1.42 (1.21 to 1.66), or 1.59 (1.29 to 1.96) adjusted for regression dilution bias.
Studies excluded
Four prospective studies could not be included in the analysis.
Two reported only on all cardiovascular diseases in combination; these
both showed positive associations between homocysteine concentration
and mixed vascular disease.w118 w119 Two studies reported
odds ratios only relative to a specified homocysteine cut-off
value.w92 w116 We could not accurately calculate an odds
ratio for a 5 µmol/l increase in homocysteine from this, but
estimating a value for these two studies and including them in the
analysis had negligible effect (the odds ratio for ischaemic heart
disease did not change, that for stroke changed from 1.59 to 1.56).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The MTHFR studies show highly significant associations between serum homocysteine concentration and ischaemic heart disease and deep vein thrombosis. Previous meta-analyses of the MTHFR studies failed to show an effect because they lacked statistical power, but their confidence intervals were consistent with the significant estimates we present here. 11-13 17 Our analyses combine data from an extra 23 studies on ischaemic heart disease and an extra 11 studies on deep vein thrombosis since the largest previous meta-analyses. 12 17
The MTHFR studies on ischaemic heart disease and stroke showed significant heterogeneity (greater variation between study results than would be expected through chance). This is not surprising since the expression of the mutation is likely to depend on environmental factors, particularly dietary folate,11 which reduces homocysteine levels. Thus, in MTHFR studies carried out in areas where folate intake is low one would expect to find a larger difference between TT and CC homozygotes in rates of heart disease but also a larger difference in homocysteine concentrations. Heterogeneity, therefore, should not invalidate the analysis provided the results are expressed in terms of the associated differences in homocysteine concentrations.
The prospective studies show a highly significant association between serum homocysteine concentration and both ischaemic heart disease and stroke. The absence of significant heterogeneity across the 16 studies (P=0.12) does not support the view 3 4 9 that these studies divide into two groups, one with clearly positive results and one with clearly negative results (this can also be seen in fig 2).
Interpretation of evidence for causality
The results of the MTHFR and the prospective studies can be
explained in one of two ways
a direct (or causal) explanation or an
indirect (non-causal) explanation. An indirect explanation would depend
on the MTHFR and prospective studies both showing associations with
homocysteine through confounding. In the MTHFR studies the difference
in homocysteine concentration arises from a single gene mutation
effectively allocated at random. There is therefore no basis for
expecting that people with the mutant gene would systematically differ
from those without it in other cardiovascular risk factors (smoking,
blood pressure, serum cholesterol concentration), and the data show
that they do not. Genetic confounding is theoretically possible,
whereby a gene linked to the MTHFR gene controls some unknown risk
factor and coincidentally increases serum homocysteine concentration.
In the prospective studies confounding from smoking, blood pressure,
and serum cholesterol was allowed for; if there were any remaining
confounding it would also be from an unknown factor associated with
both serum homocysteine and cardiovascular disease. Importantly, the
genetic linkage that one would have to postulate to explain the
association with cardiovascular disease in the MTHFR studies could not
account for the association in the prospective studies
because the
increase in risk of about a quarter with the MTHFR variant is so much
smaller than the twofold difference in risk (10th to 90th centile) in
the prospective studies. The indirect explanation relies on a complex
and improbable series of different associations that coincidentally
yield similar cardiovascular disease risks for a given difference in
serum homocysteine concentration. The direct (causal) explanation is
plausible and much simpler.
Substantial publication bias is unlikely because many of the individual study results were not statistically significant (those in which the confidence intervals cross 1.0 in figs 1 and 3), and many of these were interpreted by their authors as being negative. A standard statistical assessment of publication bias (the regression asymmetry test18) showed no basis for concern in either the ischaemic heart disease studies (P=0.55) or the deep vein thrombosis studies (P=0.43).
Evidence of risk reduction
A placebo controlled randomised trial of treatment with B vitamins
(folic acid, B-6, and B-12) to lower serum homocysteine concentration
in patients with ischaemic heart disease has shown a rapid reduction of
risk.19 There were 13 major cardiac events (coronary
death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or revascularisation procedure)
over six months in 102 vitamin treated patients and 23 events in 94 placebo treated patients (P=0.04).19 Studies of patients
with homocystinuria treated with B vitamins have also shown reduction
in risk. In one study treatment with B vitamin led to two vascular
events when 30 would have been expected (from previous observation in
untreated patients), and in another study there were two events when 21 would have been expected.
7 20
|
Table 2 summarises the odds ratios of ischaemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and stroke for the standard 5 µmol/l increase in homocysteine concentration and shows combined odds ratios from the two types of study. For ischaemic heart disease this was 1.33 (95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.46), and for stroke it was 1.59 (1.30 to 1.95). Table 2 also converts the odds ratios for a 5 µmol/l increase in homocysteine concentration into odds ratios for a 3 µmol/l decrease in homocysteine (the maximal effect of folic acid, achieved with a daily dose of about 0.8 mg). 5 6 On the basis that the association is causal and reversible, we estimate that folic acid could reduce the risk of ischaemic heart disease by 16%, deep vein thrombosis by 25%, and stroke by 24%. The folic acid could be taken as tablets by high risk patients, and possibly supplied to the general public through food fortification or a combination of both.
Conclusion
Our results strengthen the evidence that a raised serum
homocysteine concentration is a cause of cardiovascular disease. Our
conclusion that it is a cause rests on the following observations:
In the light of these five observations we could not have concluded otherwise.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Nicholas Wald for his suggestions throughout this project and for his comments on the manuscript. DSW also holds an honorary research fellowship at the Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry. At the time of our checking the proofs of our paper, two other meta-analyses were published in relation to ischaemic heart disease and stroke, yielding results consistent with our own. 21 22
Contributors: DW, ML and JM were involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data and in writing the manuscript. DW is guarantor for the study.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None declared.
The references used in the
meta-analysis appear on bmj.com
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Boushey CJ, Beresford SAA, Omenn GS, Motulsky AG.
A quantitative assessment of plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for vascular disease.
JAMA
1995;
274:
1049-1057 |
| 2. | Danesh J, Lewington S. Plasma homocysteine and coronary heart disease. Systematic review of published epidemiological studies. J Cardiovasc Risk 1998; 5: 229-292[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Eikelboom JW, Lonn E, Genest J, Hankey G, Yusuf S.
Homocyst(e)ine and cardiovascular disease: a critical review of the epidemiological evidence.
Ann Intern Med
1999;
131:
363-375 |
| 4. | Cleophas TJ, Hornstra N, van Hoogstraten B, van der Meulen J. Homocysteine, a risk factor for coronary artery disease or not? A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 86: 1005-1009. |
| 5. |
Homocysteine Lowering Trialists Collaboration.
Lowering blood homocysteine with folic acid based supplements: meta-analysis of randomised trials.
BMJ
1998;
316:
894-898 |
| 6. |
Wald DS, Bishop L, Wald NJ, Law MR, Hennessy E, McPartlin J, et al.
Randomised trial of folic acid supplementation on serum homocysteine levels.
Arch Intern Med
2001;
161:
695-700 |
| 7. |
Mudd SH, Skovby F, Levy HL, Pettigrew KD, Wilcken B, Pyeritz RE, et al.
The natural history of homocystinuria due to cystathionine -synthase deficiency.
Am J Hum Genet
1997;
37:
1-31.
|
| 8. | Wilcken DE, Wilcken B. The natural history of vascular disease in homocystinuria and the effects of treatment. J Inherit Metab Dis 1997; 20: 295-300[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 9. |
Wald NJ, Watt HC, Law MR, Weir DG, McPartlin J, Scott JM.
Homocysteine and ischaemic heart disease: results of a prospective study with implications regarding prevention.
Arch Intern Med
1998;
158:
862-867 |
| 10. | Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, Goyette P, Sheppard CA, Matthews RG, et al. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofoloate reductase. Nat Genet 1995; 10: 111-113[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 11. |
Brattstrom L, Wilcken DEL, Ohrvik J, Brudin L.
Common methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene mutation leads to hyperhomocysteinemia but not to vascular disease.
Circulation
1998;
98:
2520-2526 |
| 12. |
Kluijtmans LAJ, Kastelein JJP, Lindemans J, Boers GH, Heil SG, Bruschke AV, et al.
Thermolabile methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase in coronary artery disease.
Circulation
1997;
96:
2573-2577 |
| 13. | Jee SH, Beaty TH, Suh I, Yoon Y, Appel LJ. The methylenetetrahydrogolate reductase gene is associated with increased cardiovascular risk in Japan, but not in other populations. Atherosclerosis 2000; 153: 161-168[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 14. | MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P, Neaton J, et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 1990; 335: 765-774[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 15. | Clarke R, Lewington S, Donald A, Johnston C, Refsum H, Stratton I, et al. Underestimation of the importance of homocysteine as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in epidemiological studies. J Cardiovasc Risk 2001; 8: 363-369[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 16. |
Law MR, Wald NJ.
Risk factor thresholds: their existence under scrutiny.
BMJ
2002;
324:
1570-1576 |
| 17. |
Brattstrom L, Wilcken DEL.
Homocysteine and cardiovascular disease: cause or effect?
Am J Clin Nutr
2000;
72:
315-323 |
| 18. |
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C.
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
BMJ
1997;
315:
629-634 |
| 19. |
Schnyder G, Roffi M, Pin R, Flammer Y, Lange H, Eberli FR, et al.
Decreased rate of coronary restenosis after lowering of plasma homocysteine levels.
N Engl J Med
2001;
345:
1593-1600 |
| 20. |
Kluijtmans LAJ, Boers GHD, Kraus JP, van den Henvel LPWJ, Cruysberg JRM, Trijbels FJM, et al.
The molecular basis of cystathionine -synthase deficiency in Dutch patients with homocystinuria: effect of CBS genotype on biochemical and clinical phenotype and on response to treatment.
Am J Hum Gen
1999;
65:
59-67[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].
|
| 21. |
Klerk M, Verhoef P, Clarke R, Blom HJ, Kok FJ, Schouten FG, et al.
MTHFR 677C T polymorphism and risk of coronary heart disease.
JAMA
2002;
288:
2023-2031 |
| 22. |
Homocysteine Studies Collaboration.
Homocysteine and risk of ischaemic heart disease and stroke. A meta-analysis.
JAMA
2002;
288:
2015-2022 |
(Accepted 12 August 2002)
T polymorphism and coronary heart disease: does totality of evidence support causal role for homocysteine and preventive potential of folate?
Read all Rapid Responses