Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Rachelle Buchbinder a Department of Clinical
Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital and Monash University Department of
Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Cabrini Medical Centre, Malvern,
Victoria, Australia 3144, b School of Health
Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia 3125, c Department of Epidemiology and Preventive
Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3004
Correspondence
to: R Buchbinder
rachelle.buchbinder{at}med.monash.edu.au
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness of a
population based, state-wide public health intervention designed to
alter beliefs about back pain, influence medical management, and reduce disability and costs of compensation.
Design:
Quasi-experimental, non-randomised,
non-equivalent, before and after telephone surveys of the general
population and postal surveys of general practitioners with an adjacent
state as control group and descriptive analysis of claims database.
Setting:
Two states in Australia.
Participants:
4730 members of general population
before and two and two and a half years after campaign started, in a ratio of 2:1:1; 2556 general practitioners before and two years after
campaign onset.
Main outcome measures:
Back beliefs questionnaire,
knowledge and attitude statements about back pain, incidence of
workers' financial compensation claims for back problems, rate of
days compensated, and medical payments for claims related to back pain
and other claims.
Results:
In the intervention state beliefs about back pain became more positive between successive surveys (mean improvement in questionnaire score 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.5), P<0.001 and 3.2 (2.6 to 3.9), P<0.001, between baseline and the second and third survey, respectively). Beliefs about back pain also
improved among doctors. There was a clear decline in number of claims
for back pain, rates of days compensated, and medical payments for
claims for back pain over the duration of the campaign.
Conclusions:
A population based strategy of provision
of positive messages about back pain improves population and general practitioner beliefs about back pain and seems to influence medical management and reduce disability and workers' compensation costs related to back pain.
|
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients' attitudes and beliefs, particularly fear avoidance beliefs and passive coping strategies, are increasingly accepted as having an important role in disability related to back problems,1-4 as is management based on the biopsychosocial model.5 Despite an increase in evidence that staying active and continuing or resuming ordinary activities is more effective than rest6 and that early investigation and referral to a specialist are unwarranted in most cases,7 surveys of physicians continue to show that only few give this advice on management. 8 9 This may reflect physicians' knowledge and beliefs,8 although physicians' behaviour may also be influenced by patients' expectations and other psychosocial factors. 10 11
As previously suggested by Deyo, with such a paradigm shift from the traditional model of management of back pain it may be that the public as well as the medical profession need to be re-educated.12 If re-education can change attitudes and beliefs and give rise to a concomitant alteration in patients' expectations and physicians' behaviour, the rising incidence of disability from low back pain may be stemmed or reversed.
In Victoria, Australia, a state of 4.3 million
people,13 the workers' compensation system paid out $A385
million (£142m) in claims for back pain in the 1996-7 financial
year.14 This figure had tripled in one
decade.14 In 1997 the Victorian WorkCover Authority, the
manager of the workers' compensation system, embarked on a
state-wide public health campaign aimed at altering the general population's attitudes and beliefs about back pain. We measured the
effectiveness of the impact of this campaign on population beliefs
about back pain and on the knowledge and attitudes of general
practitioners in telephone and mailed surveys. As the campaign was
ubiquitous in the state of Victoria we used a quasi-experimental, non-randomised, non-equivalent before and after study designs, with an
adjacent state, New South Wales, as control. We measured the effect of
the campaign on incidence, days of compensation, and medical costs of
claims for back problems.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Setting
The workers' compensation systems of Victoria and New South Wales
are state based, no fault systems with limited access to common law.
Both are funded through the public system structure and administered
through private industry. To our knowledge, no state-wide public health
intervention for back pain took place in New South Wales during the
period of our study. Victoria and New South Wales have almost identical
sex and age distributions, and about three quarters of both populations
were born in Australia.13 The population of New South
Wales is 6.0 million.13
Public health campaign intervention
The public health campaign was based on the messages in
The Back Book, an evidence based educational booklet for
patients produced in the United Kingdom by a multidisciplinary team of
authors.15 In line with current guidelines both the booklet and the campaign provide sharply focused, unambiguous advice
directed towards staying active and exercising, not resting for
prolonged periods, and remaining at work.16
Population surveys
We used a computer assisted questionnaire administered during a
telephone interview of three separate cross sectional random samples of
the employed population in Victoria and New South Wales before and two
and two and a half years after the campaign started. The interviews
were conducted at the same time of day at each time point. We used a
concurrent interstate control group to adjust for any cointerventions
that may have affected both states equally over the period of the
study. To evaluate the effect of cointerventions that may have occurred only in the state of Victoria over the study period we administered the
questionnaire after the intervention at two time points (comprising half at each time point).
The primary measure of beliefs about back
pain was the back beliefs questionnaire, which is designed to measure beliefs about the inevitable consequences of future life with low back
problems.19 Respondents indicated their degree of
agreement with each of 14 statements on a 5 point scale (1=agree to
5=disagree). A higher score indicates a more positive belief about low
back trouble, suggesting better ability to cope with low back pain. We
collected demographic data, and respondents were asked about their
previous experience of back pain (ever, in the past year, and in the
past week). At each time point they were also asked about their
awareness of any advertising campaigns about back pain and whether any
awareness had influenced their attitudes and beliefs about back pain.
General practitioner surveys
We carried out a postal survey of a random sample of general
practitioners before and two years after the campaign started. The
design was similar to the population surveys.
We modified the questionnaire from one
developed in Ontario, Canada.20 It included a set of
questions to determine what the doctors knew about the management of
acute low back pain and attitudes towards the patients. The questions
were phrased as statements and responses were on a 5 point Likert scale
that ranged from strongly agree to strongly disagree. We also collected information on demographic details and practice characteristics.
Claims database
To map changes in number and duration of claims and medical
pay out for claims over the time period of the campaign we abstracted
information from the Victorian WorkCover Authority claims database at
monthly intervals from May 1997 to November 1999. We calculated the
total number of days compensated and medical payments across all
continuing claims for each month from August 1997 to November 1999. Totals for each month were divided by the number of days in the month
and by the total number of claims in the database contributing to the
total. Thus the numbers reported can be interpreted as rates (of days
compensated and of total and medical payments, respectively) per claim day.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Population surveys
There were 4730 surveys completed, with equal numbers in each
state, and a ratio of 2:1:1 across the three time periods (table 1).
Demographic characteristics and previous experience of back pain
were similar at each time point both within and between states (table
1). At baseline about half of the respondents in both states had
been aware of back pain advertising in the previous year. While this
did not change over time in New South Wales, there was a significant
increase in awareness of back pain advertising in Victoria (from 47%
at baseline to 74% at survey 2 and 86% at survey 3, P<0.001). This
was accompanied by a self reported change in beliefs about back pain as
a consequence of advertising (23% at survey 1, 39% at survey 2, and
48% at survey 3, P<0.001).
|
|
General practitioner surveys
There were 2556 surveys completed. As for the population surveys,
the number of doctors who were aware of a back pain media campaign rose
significantly in Victoria between successive surveys (from 16% at
survey 1 to 89% at survey 2; P<0.001). This was accompanied by a rise
in the proportion of doctors who reported that the campaign had changed
their beliefs about back pain (from 3% to 32%, P<0.001).
|
Claims database
Figure 1 shows the relative number of claims, indexed to the year
before the campaign started (1996-7) for claims for back problems and
other claims. In contrast with other claims, there was a clear
decline in number of claims for back problems, representing a reduction
of over 15% in absolute numbers over the duration of the campaign. The
interaction between type of claim and a quadratic polynomial function
of year, which tested the difference in curvature between the two
series, was significant (P=0.013).
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Positive shift in beliefs about back pain
Our results indicate that a population based intervention of
provision of explicit advice about back pain can positively alter
beliefs about back pain in the general population and positively
influence knowledge and attitudes among doctors. We have also shown
that this may be an effective strategy for reducing disability and
costs related to back pain. Previous attempts to reduce disability
related to low back pain have largely been directed towards limiting
the problem once it has developed or modifying occupational risk
factors to reduce occurrence of back pain in the
workplace.
21 22
One population based primary prevention strategy that has been studied was a nationwide back school programme that was started in Switzerland in 1990.23 However,
participation was voluntary and was found to be significantly
associated with the presence of previous back pain problems. To our
knowledge, the Victoria WorkCover Authority public health campaign is
the first true population based primary prevention intervention to be
performed and rigorously evaluated.
Population strategy of prevention
The positive shift in population beliefs about back pain in
Victoria was seen across the whole distribution of back beliefs at
baseline (data not shown). This is in keeping with the "population
strategy" of prevention, which attempts to control the determinants
of incidence in the population by shifting the whole distribution
of exposure in a favourable direction.25 With good
evidence that negative attitudes and beliefs are important in
contributing to disability due to low back pain, the altering of
societal views is an appropriate and potentially highly effective strategy to adopt. Not only may it be effective in altering
beliefs among high risk groups that may be hard to identify, in
the context of such a common disorder as back pain, even altering
the beliefs of low and medium risk groups is likely to confer a large
benefit.26 In addition, if these views are commonly
accepted then it will be easier to persuade individuals to adopt them.
Mass media campaign
This is the first description of a mass media campaign directed
towards reducing disability due to back pain. However, media campaigns
are an established strategy for delivering preventive health
messages.
27 28
They have been used to alter a wide
variety of health related behaviours, including smoking,29 exposure to sun,30 and physical activity,31
and have also been used to promote preventive asthma therapy, cancer
and HIV screening, immunisation programmes, and emergency services for suspected myocardial infarction.28
Conclusion
Our study provides empirical evidence for the value of a
population based strategy of provision of positive messages about back
pain in reducing disability and workers' compensation costs related to
back pain. Further research should be directed towards measuring
whether the effect of the campaign is sustained over time. The results
of our study should also encourage others to adapt the campaign for use
and evaluation in other settings.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Kim Burton, Gordon Waddell, Rick Deyo, and Ron Borland for constructive comments on design issues and results.
Contributors: RB designed the overall evaluation of the campaign. DJ contributed to the design and performed the analyses. MW liaised with the Victoria WorkCover Authority and coordinated the studies. All three contributed to the analyses and interpretation of the results and jointly wrote the paper. RB is guarantor for the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: Victoria WorkCover Authority.
Competing interests: None declared.
The full version of this paper
appears on the BMJ's website
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Linton S. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. In: Nachemson A, Jonsson E, eds. Neck and back pain: the scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000. |
| 2. | Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 1993; 52: 157-168[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ, Hollis S. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine 1995; 20: 722-728[Medline]. |
| 4. | Symonds TL, Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ. Do attitudes and beliefs influence work loss due to low back trouble? Occup Med 1996; 46: 25-32. |
| 5. | Waddell G. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 1987; 12: 632-644[Medline]. |
| 6. | Waddell G, Feder G, Lewis M. Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain. Br J Gen Pract 1997; 47: 647-652[Medline]. |
| 7. | Deyo RA, Phillips WR. Low back pain. A primary care challenge. Spine 1996; 21: 2826-2832[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Wheeler K, Ciol MA. Physician views about treating low back pain. The results of a national survey. Spine 1995; 20: 1-10[Medline]. |
| 9. |
Little P, Smith L, Cantrell T, Chapman J, Langridge J, Pickering R.
General practitioners' management of acute back pain: a survey of reported practice compared with clinical guidelines.
BMJ
1996;
312:
485-488 |
| 10. |
Chew-Graham C, May C.
Chronic low back pain in general practice: the challenge of the consultation.
Fam Pract
1999;
16:
46-49 |
| 11. |
Little P, Cantrell T, Roberts L, Chapman J, Langridge J, Pickering R.
Why do GPs perform investigations? The medical and social agendas in arranging back x rays.
Fam Pract
1998;
15:
264-265 |
| 12. | Deyo RA. Acute low back pain: a new paradigm for management. BMJ 1996:1343-4. |
| 13. | Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1996 census of population and housing. Canberra, Australia: ABS, 1996. |
| 14. | Victorian WorkCover Authority. Statistical report 1998-1999. Melbourne: Victorian WorkCover Authority, 2000. |
| 15. | Roland M, Waddell G, Moffat J, Burton A, Main C, Cantrell T. The back book. London: Stationery Office, 1996. |
| 16. | Burton AK, Waddell G, Tillotson KM, Summerton N. Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect. A randomised controlled trial of a novel educational booklet in primary care. Spine 1999; 24: 2484-2491[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Victorian WorkCover Authority. Guidelines for the management of employees with compensable low back pain. Melbourne: Victorian WorkCover Authority, 1996. |
| 18. | Desk Top Marketing Systems. Marketing Pro. Melbourne: DtMS Pty, 1997. |
| 19. | Symonds TL, Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ. Absence resulting from low back trouble can be reduced by psychosocial intervention at the work place. Spine 1995; 20: 2738-2745[Medline]. |
| 20. | Bombardier C, Jansz G, Maetzel A, the Primary Care Collaborative Group. Primary care physicians' knowledge, confidence and attitude in the management of acute low back pain (ALBP). Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38(suppl 9): 385. |
| 21. | Frank JW, Kerr MS, Brooker AS, DeMaio SE, Maetzel A, Shannon HS, et al. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part I: What do we know about primary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention before disability begins. Spine 1996; 21: 2908-2917[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. |
van Poppel MN, Koes BW, Smid T, Bouter LM.
A systematic review of controlled clinical trials on the prevention of back pain in industry.
Occup Environ Med
1997;
54:
841-847 |
| 23. |
Weber M, Cedraschi C, Roux E, Kissling R, Von Känel S, Dalvit G.
A prospective controlled study of low back school in the general population.
Br J Rheumatol
1996;
35:
178-183 |
| 24. | Indahl A, Haldorsen EH, Holm S, Reikeras O, Ursin H. Five year follow-up study of a controlled clinical trial using light mobilization and an informative approach to low back pain. Spine 1998; 23: 2625-2630[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. |
Rose G.
Sick individuals and sick populations.
Int J Epidemiol
1985;
14:
32-38 |
| 26. | Rose G. The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. |
| 27. |
Redman S, Spencer E, Sanson-Fisher RW.
The role of mass media in changing health-related behaviour: a critical appraisal of two methods.
Health Promot Int
1990;
5:
85-101 |
| 28. | Grilli R, Freemantle N, Minozzi S, Domenighetti G, Finer D. Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(2):CD000389. |
| 29. |
Sly D, Heald G, Ray S.
The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations.
Tob Control
2001;
10:
9-15 |
| 30. | Hill D, White V, Marks R, Borland R. Changes in sun-related attitudes and behaviours, and reduced sunburn prevalence in a population at high risk of melanoma. Eur J Cancer Prev 1993; 2: 447-456[Medline]. |
| 31. |
Owen N, Bauman A, Booth M, Oldenburg B, Magnus P.
Serial mass-media campaigns to promote physical activity: reinforcing or redundant?
Am J Public Health
1995;
85:
244-248 |
(Accepted 6 April 2001)
Read all Rapid Responses