Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
In his millennial musings historian Roy Porter unfashionably
doubts whether the human genome project will dramatically transform medical practice or spectacularly enhance human health (p 1092). But he
gets some support from clinician and scientist David Weatherall, who
argues that those expecting rapid progress to follow the sequencing of
the human genome may be disappointed (p 1117). He looks at the commonest
diseases caused by a single gene, in particular
thalassaemia, and
accounts for the bewildering phenotypic variability of the disease by
"layer upon layer of genetic complexity, with a strong environmental
component." How much harder therefore will it be to unravel
genetically the many common diseases of Western society that seem
to have a genetic component, but are not inherited in a Mendelian
fashion? Jane Kaye and Paul Martin worry that in an era
when people's confidence in the governance of clinical practice is at
an all time low, controversial research might be an early casualty
(p 1146). They discuss the UK Population Biomedical Collection, which
will contain DNA samples from up to half a million people and will link
to medical records and family histories through general practices. The
authors look at the lessons to be learnt from the Icelandic Health
Sector Database and believe that the outstanding issues deserve
widespread public debate. They argue for a clear legal framework and
strong independent oversight
if the public is to be convinced that
sensitive genetic information will not be misused.