Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Anna Kiessling a Centre for
Clinical Education, Danderyd University Hospital and Karolinska
Institute, SE-182 88 Stockholm, Sweden, b Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute at Danderyd
University Hospital, SE-182 88 Stockholm, Sweden
Correspondence to: P
Henriksson Peter.Henriksson{at}med.ds.sll.se
Objective:
To study the efficacy of case method
learning, for general practitioners, on patients' lipid concentrations
in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease.
Design:
Prospective controlled trial.
Setting:
Södertälje, Stockholm County, Sweden.
Participants:
255 consecutive patients with coronary
artery disease.
Intervention:
Guidelines were mailed to all general
practitioners (n=54) and presented at a common lecture. General
practitioners who were randomised to the intervention group
participated in recurrent case method learning dialogues at their
primary healthcare centres during a two year period. A locally well
known cardiologist served as a facilitator.
Main outcome measure:
Concentration of low density
lipoprotein cholesterol at baseline and after two years. Analysis
according to intention to treat (intervention and control groups
(n=88)) was based on group affiliation at baseline.
Results:
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol was
reduced by 0.5 mmol/l (95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.8 mmol/l)
(9.3% (2.9% to 15.8%)) from baseline in patients in the intervention group and by 0.5 (0.1 to 0.9) mmol/l compared with controls (P<0.05). No change occurred in the control group (0.0 (
0.2 to 0.2) mmol/l). Low density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased by 0.6 (0.4 to 0.8) mmol/l in a group of patients who received specialist care.
Conclusion:
Case method learning resulted in a
lowering of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in the primary care
patients with coronary artery disease comparable to that achieved at a specialist clinic. Conventional presentation of practice guidelines had
no effect.