Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
DAFNE Study Group Correspondence to: S Heller,
Clinical Sciences Centre, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road,
Sheffield S5 7AU s.heller{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Objectives:
To evaluate whether a course teaching
flexible intensive insulin treatment combining dietary freedom and
insulin adjustment can improve both glycaemic control and quality of
life in type 1 diabetes.
What is already known on this topic
An approach to intensive insulin treatment in which participants match
insulin dose to unrestricted food choices has been developed in
Germany This approach has been shown to lead to sustained improvements in
glycaemic control but has not been widely adopted elsewhere What this study adds
This approach also leads to significant improvements in treatment
satisfaction, psychological wellbeing, and quality of life
measures
Design:
Randomised design with participants either attending training immediately (immediate DAFNE) or acting as waiting
list controls and attending "delayed DAFNE" training 6 months later.
Setting:
Secondary care diabetes clinics in three
English health districts.
Participants:
169 adults with type 1 diabetes and
moderate or poor glycaemic control.
Main outcome measures:
Glycated haemoglobin
(HbA1c), severe hypoglycaemia, impact of diabetes on
quality of life (ADDQoL).
Results:
At 6 months, HbA1c was
significantly better in immediate DAFNE patients (mean 8.4%) than in
delayed DAFNE patients (9.4%) (t=6.1, P<0.0001). The
impact of diabetes on dietary freedom was significantly improved in
immediate DAFNE patients compared with delayed DAFNE patients
(t=
5.4, P<0.0001), as was the impact of diabetes on
overall quality of life (t=2.9, P<0.01). General
wellbeing and treatment satisfaction were also significantly improved,
but severe hypoglycaemia, weight, and lipids remained unchanged.
Improvements in "present quality of life" did not reach significance at 6 months but were significant by 1 year.
Conclusion:
Skills training promoting dietary freedom improved quality of life and glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes without worsening severe hypoglycaemia or cardiovascular risk.
This approach has the potential to enable more people to adopt
intensive insulin treatment and is worthy of further investigation.
Current treatment of type 1 diabetes fails to engage many patients in
intensive self management and is associated with poor glycaemic
outcomes and impaired quality of life
Training in flexible, intensive insulin treatment can improve glycaemic
control in the United Kingdom
© BMJ 2002
Read all Rapid Responses