Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence
BMJ 2002; 325 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7355.67 (Published 13 July 2002) Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:67
- Karen Ward, clinical research associatea,
- Paul Hilton (paul.hilton{at}ncl.ac.uk), consultantb on behalf of the United Kingdom and Ireland Tension-free Vaginal Tape Trial Group.
- a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP
- b Directorate of Women's Services, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP
- Correspondence to: P Hilton
- Accepted 15 May 2002
Abstract
Objective: To compare tension-free vaginal tape with colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence.
Design: Multicentred randomised comparative trial.
Setting: Gynaecology or urology departments in 14 centres in the United Kingdom and Eire, including university teaching hospitals and district general hospitals.
Participants: 344 women with urodynamic stress incontinence; 175 randomised to tension-free vaginal tape and 169 to colposuspension
Main outcome measures: Assessment before treatment and at six months postoperatively with the SF-36, the Bristol female lower urinary tract symptoms questionnaire, the EQ-5D health questionnaire, a one week urinary diary, one hour perineal pad test, cystometry, and, in some centres, urethral profilometry.
Results: 23 women in the colposuspension group and 5 in the vaginal tape group withdrew before surgery. No significant difference was found between the groups for cure rates: 115 (66%) women in the vaginal tape group and 97 (57%) in the colposuspension group were objectively cured (95% confidence interval for difference in cure −4.7% to 21.3%). Bladder injury was more common during the vaginal tape procedure; postoperative complications, in particular delayed resumption of micturition, were more common after colposuspension. Operation time, duration of hospital stay, and return to normal activity were all longer after colposuspension than after the vaginal tape procedure.
Conclusion: Surgery with tension-free vaginal tape is associated with more operative complications than colposuspension, but colposuspension is associated with more postoperative complications and longer recovery. Vaginal tape shows promise for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence because of minimal access and rapid recovery times; cure rates at six months were comparable with colposuspension.
What is already known on this topic
What is already known on this topic Few randomised trials exist on surgery for stress incontinence
Systematic reviews suggest that colposuspension is associated with cure rates of up to 90%
Case series of tension-free vaginal tape suggest cure rates of about 85%, with rapid return to normal activity
What this study adds
What this study adds At six months the tension-free vaginal tape procedure is as effective as colposuspension for the primary treatment of stress incontinence
Operative complications were more common with vaginal tape, but duration of hospital stay and return to normal activity were shorter than with colposuspension
Postoperative complications were more common after colposuspension
Footnotes
-
Funding None.
-
Competing interests KW was supported by a grant from Ethicon, which also provided materials and additional support to collaborating centres. PH and KW have been reimbursed by Ethicon for expenses associated with attending conferences where this, and related work, has been presented.