BMJ 2002;324:1244 ( 25 May )

Papers

Assessing the outcome of compulsory psychiatric treatment in the community: epidemiological study in Western Australia

Neil J Preston, research psychologista Steve Kisely, associate professorb Jianguo Xiao, biostatisticianc

a Mental Health Directorate, Fremantle Hospital and Health Service, PO Box 480 Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia, b University Department of Psychiatry at Fremantle Hospital, University of Western Australia, 16 The Terrace, Fremantle, c Health Information Centre, Health Department of Western Australia, 189 Royal Street, East Perth, WA 6004

Correspondence to: N J Preston neil.preston{at}health.wa.gov.au

Objective: To examine whether community treatment orders for psychiatric patients reduce subsequent use of health services in comparison with control patients not placed on an order.
Design: Epidemiological study with a before and after, two stage design of matching and multivariate analysis, controlling for sociodemographic variables, clinical features, and psychiatric history.
Setting: All community based and inpatient psychiatric services in Western Australia, covering a population of 1.7 million people.
Participants: 228 subjects placed on a community treatment order, matched with an equal number of controls to give a total of 456 patients.
Main outcome measures: Inpatient admissions, bed days, and outpatient contacts one year after subjects were placed on a community treatment order or the index date of matched controls.
Results: Both subjects and their matched controls had reduced inpatient admissions and bed days in hospital. Subjects had significantly more outpatient contacts. Multivariate analysis indicated that being placed on a community treatment order was associated with increased outpatient contacts in the subsequent year compared with the control group. Otherwise, orders did not affect subsequent use of health services. Other factors associated with increased use of health services were age and inpatient admissions, bed days, and outpatient contacts before the order or index date. No covariates were shown to be associated with changes in within pair differences in inpatient admissions or bed days.
Conclusions: The introduction of compulsory treatment in the community does not lead to reduced use of health services.

What is already known on this topic
Various forms of compulsory treatment in the community have been suggested as being effective in reducing use of services by patients with mental health disorders

Studies have often lacked epidemiological sampling frames and control for possible confounding factors

What this study adds
Patients placed on community treatment orders and those not on such orders had reduced hospital admissions and bed days one year later

Placement of an order did not predict subsequent use of services

Community treatment orders may not be an effective alternative to assertive community treatment programmes





© BMJ 2002

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Community treatment orders are not effective
BMJ 2002 324: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • KISELY, S., CAMPBELL, L. A. (2007). Does compulsory or supervised community treatment reduce 'revolving door' care?: Legislation is inconsistent with recent evidence. Br. J. Psychiatry 191: 373-374 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Chaplin, R. (2007). How can clinicians help patients to take their psychotropic medication?: Invited commentary on... Why don't patients take their medicine?. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 13: 347-349 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Segal, S. P., Burgess, P. M. (2006). Factors in the Selection of Patients for Conditional Release From Their First Psychiatric Hospitalization. Psychiatr. Serv. 57: 1614-1622 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Campbell, J., Brophy, L., Healy, B., O'Brien, A. M. (2006). International Perspectives on the Use of Community Treatment Orders: Implications for Mental Health Social Workers. Br J Soc Work 36: 1101-1118 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Thornicroft, G., Szmukler, G. (2005). The Draft Mental Health Bill in England: without principles. Psychiatr. Bull. 29: 244-247 [Full text]  
  • Kisely, S. R., Xiao, J., Preston, N. J. (2004). Impact of compulsory community treatment on admission rates: Survival analysis using linked mental health and offender databases. Br. J. Psychiatry 184: 432-438 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Doc2Doc Vacancy
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ