Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Caroline L Trotter a Immunisation
Division, PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London NW9
5EQ, b Department of Economics, City University, London EC1V
0HB
Correspondence to: C Trotter
ctrotter{at}phls.org.uk
Objectives:
To assess the cost effectiveness of a
meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccination campaign in 0-17 year olds.
What is already known on this topic
In November 1999 the United Kingdom was the first country to introduce
mass vaccination against group C meningococcal disease There are no published economic evaluations of the vaccination campaign What this study adds
School based vaccination is more cost effective than routine
vaccination of infants because delivery costs are lower and fewer doses
are required
Design:
Cost effectiveness analysis from the
perspective of the healthcare provider.
Setting:
England and Wales.
Main outcome measure:
Cost per life year saved.
Results:
In 1998-9, immediately before the
introduction of meningococcal C vaccination, the burden of serogroup C
disease was considerable, with an estimated 1137 cases in people aged 0-17 years and at least 72 deaths. The vaccination campaign is estimated to have cost between £126m ($180m,
207m) and £241m ($343m,
395m), depending on the price of the vaccine. Under base case assumptions the cost per life year saved from the vaccination campaign is estimated to be £6259. School based vaccination was more
cost effective than general practice based vaccination because of lower
delivery costs. Immunisation of infants aged under 1 year was the least
cost effective component of the campaign because, although this
maximises the life years gained, the three dose schedule required is
more expensive than other methods of delivery. Estimates of the cost
per life year saved were sensitive to assumptions on the future
incidence of disease and the case fatality ratio.
Conclusions:
Meningococcal C vaccination is likely to
be more cost effective in all age groups when the incidence of disease is high. It is also more cost effective when given to children aged 1-4 (by general practitioners) and to children and young people aged 5-17 years at school than when administered to infants under 12 months of
age or young people aged 16-17 years who are not at school.
The burden of group C meningococcal disease in England and Wales in the
late 1990s was considerable
This economic evaluation supports the introduction of the meningococcal
C vaccine