Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Katja Hatakka a Valio Research and Development, PO Box 30, FIN-00039 Valio, Helsinki, Finland, b Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Helsinki
University Central Hospital, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland, c Centre of the
Environment, Helsinki City, Helsinginkatu 24, FIN-00530 Helsinki,
Finland, d STAT-Consulting, Takojankatu 15 B, FIN-33540 Tampere, Finland, e Department of Oral and Dental Diseases, Helsinki University
Hospital, PO Box 263, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland, f Helsinki City Health Department, Kytösuontie 9, FIN-00030
Helsinki, Finland, g Foundation for
Nutrition Research, PO Box 30, FIN-00039 Helsinki, Finland
Correspondence to: R Korpela riitta.korpela{at}valio.fi
Objective:
To examine whether long term
consumption of a probiotic milk could reduce gastrointestinal and
respiratory infections in children in day care centres.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
Design:
Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study over seven months.
Setting:
18 day care centres in Helsinki, Finland.
Participants:
571 healthy children aged 1-6 years: 282 (mean (SD) age 4.6 (1.5) years) in the intervention group and 289 (mean (SD) age 4.4 (1.5) years) in the control group.
Intervention:
Milk with or without
Lactobacillus GG. Average daily consumption of milk in both
groups was 260 ml.
Main outcome measures:
Number of days with respiratory
and gastrointestinal symptoms, absences from day care because of
illness, respiratory tract infections diagnosed by a doctor, and course
of antibiotics.
Results:
Children in the Lactobacillus
group had fewer days of absence from day care because of illness (4.9 (95% confidence interval 4.4 to 5.5) v 5.8 (5.3 to 6.4)
days, 16% difference, P=0.03; age adjusted 5.1 (4.6 to 5.6)
v 5.7 (5.2 to 6.3) days, 11% difference, P=0.09). There was
also a relative reduction of 17% in the number of children suffering
from respiratory infections with complications and lower respiratory
tract infections (unadjusted absolute % reduction
8.6 (
17.2 to
0.1), P=0.05; age adjusted odds ratio 0.75 (0.52 to 1.09), P=0.13)
and a 19% relative reduction in antibiotic treatments for respiratory
infection (unadjusted absolute % reduction
9.6 (
18.2 to
1.0),
P=0.03; adjusted odds ratio 0.72 (0.50 to 1.03), P=0.08) in the
Lactobacillus group.
Conclusions:
Lactobacillus GG may reduce
respiratory infections and their severity among children in day care.
The effects of the probiotic Lactobacillus GG were modest
but consistently in the same direction.
Children attending day care centres are at high risk of respiratory and
gastrointestinal infection
In a double blind, randomised, long term study milk containing
Lactobacillus GG slightly reduced the incidence of
respiratory infections and antibiotic treatment in
children
Read all Rapid Responses